I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 considering that the conventional news have actually guaranteed extremely people that are few the information regarding the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought not to have now been arrested in britain to start with while there is no instance, with no investigation that is genuine. Check this out and you also will understand why.
One other thing maybe not commonly grasped can there be isn’t any JURY in a rape test in Sweden and it’s also a SECRET TEST. Every one of the proof, all the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no media. The actual only real part that is public the charging and also the verdict. There was a judge as well as 2 advisers straight appointed by governmental events. Which means you never ever would get to comprehend exactly how clearly the situation is really a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You will find therefore inconsistencies that are many Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. rabbitscams.com Nevertheless the key question which leaps down I have not seen asked anywhere else – is this at me– and which strangely:
Why did Anna Ardin maybe not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood within the Swedish team around Assange for the shocking red cashmere sweater she had used into the front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange ended up being intending to have sex with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who had been interested in Assange:
“He’s maybe maybe not right right here. He’s planned to possess intercourse aided by the girl that is cashmere night, although not managed to make it. Maybe he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days previously, on 13 August, she have been intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she had been prepared to take to (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s life that is entire. She has also been to convey that this attack included enforced non-safe sex and she had been concerned with HIV.
If Ardin really thought that on 13 August Assange had forced unsafe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And just why had been Ardin speaking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about this to buddies, without any obvious disapproval or discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information and even had organised her registration for the press meeting. She could have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into an extremely brief survey regarding the entire relationship that is ardin/Assange.
11 August: Assange arrives in Stockholm for the press meeting organised with a branch of this Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat as she will be away for him to stay in.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got supper with Assange and they’ve got consensual intercourse, in the day that is first of. Ardin later alleges this changed into assault by surreptitious mutilation associated with the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him regarding the dais at their press meeting. Assange fulfills Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a crayfish party, anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This make an effort to find a crayfish celebration fails, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early morning. Another provides to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless during the party that is crayfish Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting out-of-doors at 02:00 and scarcely freezing with all the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, in accordance with both their authorities testimonies, rest once more in identical solitary sleep, and continue doing so for the next day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have sexual intercourse; Anna tells police they cannot. That night, Anna and Julian get together to, and then leave together from, a dinner because of the leadership associated with the Pirate Party. They again sleep within the bed that is same.
16 August: Julian would go to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin doesn’t alert her of prospective sexual attack. Another buddy provides Anna to dominate housing Julian. Anna once again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she actually is concerned about STD’s including HIV after unsafe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague for a passing fancy ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to just take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s unrecorded – in breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration accusing Assange of rape. Wilen does not want to signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities statement alleging Assange has surreptiously had unsafe sex with her eight times formerly.
Some days later on: Ardin creates a broken condom towards the police as proof; however a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA it is apparently unused on it, and indeed.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s Ardin-arranged interview with Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead to not whine of a assault, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration alleging rape, that has been drafted by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
Hence ordinary this 1 of a few things took place:
Ardin ended up being intimately assaulted with non-safe sex, but neglected to alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general public and personal with him, behave as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated proposes to support him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him the usage of her one bed flat while she ended up being away. By her very own admission, she had sex that is consensual him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after non-safe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning feminist buddy, policewoman Irmeli Krans, so that you can twist Wilen’s tale into a sexual assault – quite easy given Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape legislation. Wilen declined to signal.
During the authorities place on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did n’t need to place any costs against JA nevertheless the authorities desired to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.
The next night at 22.22 she texted “it ended up being law enforcement whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then made her story that is own of attack. As a lot of buddies knew she had been sex with Assange, she could perhaps perhaps perhaps not claim sex that is non-consensual. Therefore she manufactured her tale to fit right in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event associated with the condom that is torn. However the torn condom she produced doesn’t have trace of Assange onto it. It really is impractical to wear a condom and never keep a DNA trace.
We have no trouble in stating that We securely think Ardin to be a liar. On her tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior which will be, within the literal feeling, amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever expected to see all of this detail. Rape studies in Sweden are held totally in key. There is no jury, while the national government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by political events. If Assange would go to Sweden, he can vanish into prison, the test are going to be key, in addition to next thing you are going to hear is the fact that he is responsible and a rapist.
Next, needless to say, it doesn’t matter the data can be so poor, as simply to cry rape would be to tarnish a man’s reputation forever. Anna Ardin has succeeded in destroying most of the work and life of Assange. The main points associated with the tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to consider the data. That she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro groups in Havana and Miami if you are not allowed to know who the accuser is, how can you find out?
Finally, to those helpful idiots whom declare that the best way to test these issues is with in court, i might state needless to say, you may be appropriate, we have to trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, so we should definitely condemn the behaviour that is disgraceful of whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.